Fusarium Ear Blight - Identification and Management
What is Fusarium Ear Blight?
What is Fusarium Ear Blight?
|Ear Blight species||Mycotoxin produced|
|F. graminearum||DON, NIV, ZON|
|F. culmorum||DON, NIV, ZON|
|F. avenaceum||Enniatins, Moniliformin, Beauvericin|
|F. poae||HT-2 Toxin, T2 Toxin, NIV|
|F. langsethiae||HT-2 Toxin, T2 Toxin, DAS|
|M. nivale and majus||none produced|
Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum produce the DON (deoxynivalenol) and ZON (zearalenone) mycotoxins, for which strict European guidelines are set for levels in grain. Fusarium poae produces HT-2 and T2 toxins, for which legislation is being considered.
Microdochium nivale does not produce mycotoxins, but results in seed infections which reduce seed germination and seedling vigour.
Each species has slightly different temperature optima, but general risk factors are:
Whilst the common focus for suppressing ear blight infections is mycotoxin reduction, the ear bleaching species Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum can reduce yield by up to 30%, since a single spikelet infection will prevent nutrient and water flow to uninfected spikelets above it. This results in extensive grain shrivelling.
The non-mycotoxin former Microdochium nivale, commonly found in association with true Fusarium species, can also impact yield by up to 10%.
Single spikelet infections do not restrict upwards nutrient and water flow, which is why yield penalties are generally smaller. However, in very severe infections such as seen in 2012, multiple infection of single spikelets can give risk to what looks like a Fusarium infection (see Microdochium page).
As a common rule of thumb, the following applies:
Field symtoms are often combinations of all three.Inadidtion, severe Microdochium infections can end up looking like true Fusarium infections as seen in the difficult epidemic of 2012
Several criteria need to be considered to optimise control:
Application timing is probably the most important decision after product choice. A wheat crop is most susceptible during flowering, but prothioconazole-based sprays have been independently proven to have significant activity on Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum from T1 and T2 sprays, by reducing this early season inoculum. This can be achieved using Proline275 or Aviator235Xpro at T1 and Aviator235Xpro or AscraXpro at T2.
An application of 0.55-0.72 L/ha Proline275 at T3 remains the best Fusarium and Microdochium product for effective ear blight suppression.
Fungicidal control is only one element of an integrated approach to reducing FEB, which includes use of resistant cultivars and cultural practices. As no method is 100% effective against FEB an integrated approach to crop protection should always be used.
Find out more information on the key disease threats to your wheat crop. For each disease you will find out the importance of the disease in terms of potential yield penalty, how to identify the disease in its early stages and our advice on the best control strategies.