Skip to main contentSkip to footer

Local Insights

6 key performance measures for arable farms

Article overview

Measuring financial and physical performance helps to benchmark costs and business performance. But with so many different elements to consider, what are most appropriate measures for arable farms?

Measuring financial and physical performance helps to benchmark costs and business performance. But with so many different elements to consider, what are most appropriate measures for arable farms?

Strutt & Parker recommends starting with six simple performance indicators, summarised in the table and chart below. They are all quick, straightforward calculations that do not require detailed financial accounts, but still provide a useful indicator of how key costs and operational capacity compare, says the firm’s George Badger.This can highlight potential areas for savings and show where more detailed financial analysis and benchmarking comparisons may be worthwhile.

Measurement

What it shows

1. Cropped hectares per Arable Labour Unit (one ALU = 2,200 hours worked/year)

The total amount of land farmed by anyone involved in practical crop production work (including farm manager) Indicates if labour costs are too high (i.e. <200ha/person) Target is typically 400ha (1,000 acres) per person, although average is nearer 266ha Only the top 25% of farms achieve >300ha/person

2. Litres of red diesel used per cropped hectare

Simplistic indicator of general power and machinery costs Highlight particularly intensive crop establishment/cultivation strategies Results can be skewed by soil type and seasonal conditions

3. Horsepower per cropped hectare (total hp of all tractors, telehandlers and self-propelled sprayers - excludes combine/forage harvester(s))

Indicates whether a farm has too much powered machinery for the cropped area Traditional target is 1hp/ha, however many farms are nearer 1.5hp/ha Only the top 25% of farms get near 1hp/ha High hp/ha is not necessarily bad, especially if tractors are older/ second-hand (lower depreciation), or if more machinery affords greater operational timeliness and attention to detail Soil type may also be a factor

4. Drilled hectares per metre of drill width (excludes cultivators with seeder units)

Measures 4-6 are indicators of operational capacity rather than cost Provide a guide as to whether key machinery is being fully utilised Can show whether there is machine capacity to take on additional area Again, there may be good reasons for having spare capacity, e.g. timeliness, farm logistics

5. Cropped hectares per metre of sprayer boom

6. Combined hectares per metre of combine cutter bar

The charts below show aggregated results produced by Strutt & Parker from more than 145 farms, ranging from 100ha to 2500ha.

Source: Strutt & Parker

Labour & machinery detail

Labour and machinery represent the largest costs on many farms, so are often the focus for benchmarking.Mr Badger recommends calculating total labour costs (including all full/part-time staff, benefits, accommodation, pensions, NI contributions, etc.) and total machinery costs (depreciation, repairs, fuel, insurance, interest, hire charges etc.) on a per hectare basis.After this, you can go into more detail to examine the costs of operating individual machines and calculate a running cost per hour. This in turn, can be used to work out the total operational cost for growing a specific crop.

For example, S&P analysis put the average operational cost for winter wheat close to £300/ha, although this ranges widely from £200 to £400/ha.“You can convert this figure to a per tonne basis, but given yield varies so much, we’ve found it more useful to compare farms on an area basis.”

Published on 8th November 2018

Other users have also read

Discover more in our Insights